open access publication

Article, Early Access, 2023

Report of the ILAE SUDEP Task Force on national recommendations and practices around the world regarding the use of wearable seizure detection devices: A global survey

EPILEPSIA OPEN, 10.1002/epi4.12801

Contributors

Zelano, Johan 0000-0001-9445-4545 [1] [2] Beniczky, S. 0000-0002-6035-6581 [3] [4] Ryvlin, Philippe 0000-0001-7775-6576 [5] [6] Surges, Rainer 0000-0002-3177-8582 (Corresponding author) [7] Tomson, Torbjoern 0000-0003-0554-5352 [8] ILAE SUDEP Task Force

Affiliations

  1. [1] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Neurol, Gothenburg, Sweden
  2. [NORA names: Sweden; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Neurosci & Physiol, Dept Clin Neurosci, Gothenburg, Sweden
  4. [NORA names: Sweden; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, Aarhus, Denmark
  6. [NORA names: AU Aarhus University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  7. [4] Danish Epilepsy Ctr, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, Dianalund, Denmark
  8. [NORA names: Filadelfia - Danish Epilepsy Hospital; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  9. [5] Lausanne Univ Hosp CHUV, Dept Clin Neurosci, Lausanne, Switzerland
  10. [NORA names: Switzerland; Europe, Non-EU; OECD];

Abstract

Wearable seizure detection devices have the potential to address unmet needs of people with epilepsy. A recently published evidence-based international guideline recommends using such devices for safety indications in patients with tonic-clonic seizures (TCS). Our objective was to map existing guidelines and clinical practices at national level. We conducted a survey of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) chapters regarding national recommendations and practical circumstances for prescribing seizure detection devices, and another survey of physicians in the ILAE constituency anywhere in the world, concerning their views and practices regarding recommendations for and prescription of such devices. Fifty-eight ILAE chapters (response rate 48%) and 157 physicians completed the surveys. More than two-thirds of responding countries do not have standards on wearables for seizure detection, although they indicated availability of such devices. The most often recognized indications were safety and objective seizure quantification. In nearly half of countries, devices are purchased by patients or caregivers, and either lack a uniform reimbursement scheme (41%) or patients pay the full cost for the device (48%). Tonic-clonic seizure frequency, nocturnal seizures, and previous injuries were the main factors that influenced the surveyed physicians to recommend wearable seizure detection devices. Our results document the need to implement international clinical practice guidelines at national level and to consider these when deciding upon reimbursement of seizure detection devices.

Keywords

epilepsy, injuries, monitoring, patients' safety

Data Provider: Clarivate