Review, Early Access,
Accounting for intangibles: a critical review
Affiliations
- [1] LUT Univ, Business Sch, Lahti, Finland [NORA names: Finland; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
- [2] Univ Vaasa, Sch Accounting & Finance, Vaasa, Finland [NORA names: Finland; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
- [3] Aalborg Univ, Aalborg Univ Business Sch, Aalborg, Denmark [NORA names: AAU Aalborg University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
- [4] Macquarie Univ, Dept Accounting & Corp Governance, Sydney, Australia [NORA names: Australia; Oceania; OECD];
- [5] Nyenrode Business Univ, Ctr Corp Reporting Finance & Tax, Breukelen, Netherlands [NORA names: Netherlands; Europe, EU; OECD]
Abstract
Purpose - In 2000, Canibano et al. published a literature review entitled "Accounting for Intangibles: A Literature Review". This paper revisits the conclusions drawn in that paper. We also discuss the intervening developments in scholarly research, standard setting and practice over the past 20+ years to outline the future challenges for research into accounting for intangibles. Design/methodology/approach - We conducted a literature review to identify past developments and link the findings to current accounting standard-setting developments to inform our view of the future. Findings - Current intangibles accounting practices are conservative and unlikely to change. Accounting standard setters are more interested in how companies report and disclose the value of intangibles rather than changing how they are determined. Standard setters are also interested in accounting for new forms of digital assets and reporting economic, social, governance and sustainability issues and how these link to financial outcomes. The IFRS has released complementary sustainability accounting standards for disclosing value creation in response to the latter. Therefore, the topic of intangibles stretches beyond merely how intangibles create value but how they are also part of a firm's overall risk and value creation profile. Practical implications - There is much room academically, practically, and from a social perspective to influence the future of accounting for intangibles. Accounting standard setters and alternative standards, such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and European Union non-financial and sustainability reporting directives, are competing complementary initiatives. Originality/value - Our results reveal a window of opportunity for accounting scholars to research and influence how intangibles and other non-financial and sustainability accounting will progress based on current developments.