open access publication

Review, 2024

Anaerobic digestion of process water from hydrothermal treatment processes: a review of inhibitors and detoxification approaches

BIORESOURCES AND BIOPROCESSING, Volume 11, 1, 10.1186/s40643-024-00756-6

Contributors

Zhou, Mei [1] Taiwo, Kayode [2] [3] Wang, Han [1] Ntihuga, Jean-Nepomuscene [1] Angenent, Largus T. [1] [4] [5] Usack, Joseph G. (Corresponding author) [2] [3]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Univ Tubingen, Cluster Excellence, Controlling Microbes Fight Infect, Morgenstelle 28, D-72074 Tubingen, Germany
  2. [NORA names: Germany; Europe, EU; OECD];
  3. [2] Univ Georgia, Dept Food Sci & Technol, 100 Cedar St, Athens, GA 30602 USA
  4. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];
  5. [3] Univ Georgia, Dept Food Sci & Technol, 100 Cedar St, Athens, GA 30602 USA
  6. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];
  7. [4] Aarhus Univ, Dept Biol & Chem Engn, Gustav Wieds Vej 10D, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
  8. [NORA names: AU Aarhus University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  9. [5] Max Planck Inst Biol Tubingen, AG Angenent, Max Planck Ring 5, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
  10. [NORA names: Germany; Europe, EU; OECD]

Abstract

Integrating hydrothermal treatment processes and anaerobic digestion (AD) is promising for maximizing resource recovery from biomass and organic waste. The process water generated during hydrothermal treatment contains high concentrations of organic matter, which can be converted into biogas using AD. However, process water also contains various compounds that inhibit the AD process. Fingerprinting these inhibitors and identifying suitable mitigation strategies and detoxification methods is necessary to optimize the integration of these two technologies. By examining the existing literature, we were able to: (1) compare the methane yields and organics removal efficiency during AD of various hydrothermal treatment process water; (2) catalog the main AD inhibitors found in hydrothermal treatment process water; (3) identify recalcitrant components limiting AD performance; and (4) evaluate approaches to detoxify specific inhibitors and degrade recalcitrant components. Common inhibitors in process water are organic acids (at high concentrations), total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), oxygenated organics, and N-heterocyclic compounds. Feedstock composition is the primary determinant of organic acid and TAN formation (carbohydrates-rich and protein-rich feedstocks, respectively). In contrast, processing conditions (e.g., temperature, pressure, reaction duration) influence the formation extent of oxygenated organics and N-heterocyclic compounds. Struvite precipitation and zeolite adsorption are the most widely used approaches to eliminate TAN inhibition. In contrast, powdered and granular activated carbon and ozonation are the preferred methods to remove toxic substances before AD treatment. Currently, ozonation is the most effective approach to reduce the toxicity and recalcitrance of N and O-heterocyclic compounds during AD. Microaeration methods, which disrupt the AD microbiome less than ozone, might be more practical for nitrifying TAN and degrading recalcitrant compounds, but further research in this area is necessary.

Keywords

Anaerobic digestion, Biogas, Detoxification, Hydrothermal treatment, Inhibition, Process water

Data Provider: Clarivate