Glucagonlike peptide-1 receptor agonists versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in ischemic strokes with diabetes 2

Background and purposeCardiovascular outcome trials demonstrate that glucagonlike peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), whereas dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) have not shown cardiovascular benefits. We compared acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with T2D treated with either a GLP-1RA or DPP-4i prior to the index stroke.MethodsThis national cohort study included AIS patients with T2D from 2017 to 2020 in Denmark who were users of a GLP-1RA or DPP-4i. To be categorized as a user, we required at least 12 months of exposure and no concurrent treatment with another newer glucose-lowering medication during the last 3 months prior to the index stroke. GLP-1RA users were compared to users of DPP-4i while adjusting for the calendar year of index stroke, age, sex, comorbidity, and socioeconomic factors.ResultsThe study included 1567 AIS events with T2D; 593 were users of GLP-1RA and 974 of DPP-4i. The absolute risk of a very severe stroke was 2.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2-3.7) in GLP-1RA users and 6.1% (95% CI = 4.6-7.7) in DPP-4i users. The corresponding adjusted risk ratio (aRR) of GLP-1RA versus DPP-4i was 0.49 (95% CI = 0.24-1.00). The aRRs of 30-day and 365-day mortality were 0.55 (95% CI = 0.32-0.94) and 0.72 (95% CI = 0.53-0.98), respectively.ConclusionsThe risk of a very severe stroke as well as the 30-day and 365-day poststroke mortality rates were lower among the AIS patients with comorbid T2D receiving GLP-1RA prior to the index stroke compared to those receiving DPP-4i. Hence, GLP-1RA may improve stroke outcomes in comparison with DPP-4i.