open access publication

Article, 2024

Influence of the processing on composition, protein structure and techno-functional properties of mealworm protein concentrates produced by isoelectric precipitation and ultrafiltration/diafiltration

FOOD CHEMISTRY, ISSN 0308-8146, 0308-8146, Volume 449, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.139177

Contributors

Pinel, Gwenn [1] [2] Berthelot, Ugo [1] Queiroz, Lucas Sales 0000-0002-1436-5153 [2] Santiago, Livia De Almeida [2] [3] Silva, Naaman Francisco Nogueira [2] [4] Petersen, Heidi Olander [2] Sloth, Jens J 0000-0002-3636-8769 [2] Altay, Ipek 0000-0003-4447-7479 [2] Marie, Rodolphe 0000-0002-8338-1990 [2] Feyissa, Aberham Hailu 0000-0003-4278-2023 [2] Casanova, Federico 0000-0001-7418-3223 (Corresponding author) [2] Doyen, Alain 0000-0001-9293-8036 (Corresponding author) [1]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Univ Laval, Inst Nutr & Funct Foods INAF, Dept Food Sci, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
  2. [NORA names: Canada; America, North; OECD];
  3. [2] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Hlth Technol, Orsted Plads, DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
  4. [NORA names: DTU Technical University of Denmark; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Food Engn, Campinas, SP, Brazil
  6. [NORA names: Brazil; America, South];
  7. [4] Fed Univ Sao Carlos UFSCar, Ctr Nat Sci, BR-18290000 Buri, SP, Brazil
  8. [NORA names: Brazil; America, South]

Abstract

Edible insects represent a great alternative protein source but food neophobia remains the main barrier to consumption. However, the incorporation of insects as protein-rich ingredients, such as protein concentrates, could increase acceptance. In this study, two methods, isoelectric precipitation and ultrafiltration-diafiltration, were applied to produce mealworm protein concentrates, which were compared in terms of composition, protein structure and techno-functional properties. The results showed that the protein content of the isoelectric precipitation concentrate was higher than ultrafiltration-diafiltration (80 versus 72%) but ash (1.91 versus 3.82%) and soluble sugar (1.43 versus 8.22%) contents were lower. Moreover, the protein structure was affected by the processing method, where the ultrafiltration-diafiltration concentrate exhibited a higher surface hydrophobicity (493.5 versus 106.78 a.u) and a lower denaturation temperature (161.32 versus 181.44 degrees C). Finally, the ultrafiltration-diafiltration concentrate exhibited higher solubility (87 versus 41%) and emulsifying properties at pH 7 compared to the concentrate obtained by isoelectric precipitation.

Keywords

Isoelectric precipitation, Protein concentrate, Techno-functional properties, Tenebrio molitor, Ultrafiltration-diafiltration

Data Provider: Clarivate