open access publication

Review, 2024

Radiation Therapy Technology Advances and Mitigation of Subsequent Neoplasms in Childhood Cancer Survivors

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, ISSN 0360-3016, 0360-3016, Volume 119, 2, Pages 681-696, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.01.206

Contributors

Stokkevag, Camilla H. (Corresponding author) [1] [2] Journy, Neige [2] [3] Vogelius, Ivan R. [4] Howell, Rebecca M. [5] Hodgson, David [6] Bentzen, Soren M. [7]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Oncol & Med Phys, Bergen, Norway
  2. [NORA names: Norway; Europe, Non-EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] Univ Bergen, Dept Phys & Technol, Bergen, Norway
  4. [NORA names: Norway; Europe, Non-EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] Paris Saclay Univ, French Natl Inst Hlth & Med Res, Ctr Res Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Gustave Roussy,INSERM Unit 1018, Villejuif, France
  6. [NORA names: France; Europe, EU; OECD];
  7. [4] Univ Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  8. [NORA names: KU University of Copenhagen; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  9. [5] MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX USA
  10. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];

Abstract

Purpose: In this Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) vision paper, challenges and opportunities in the assessment of subsequent neoplasms (SNs) from radiation therapy (RT) are presented and discussed in the context of technology advancement. Methods and Materials: The paper discusses the current knowledge of SN risks associated with historic, contemporary, and future RT technologies. Opportunities for research and SN mitigation strategies in pediatric patients with cancer are reviewed. Results: Present experience with radiation carcinogenesis is from populations exposed during widely different scenarios. Knowledge gaps exist within clinical cohorts and follow-up; dose -response and volume effects; dose -rate and fractionation effects; radiation quality and proton/particle therapy; age considerations; susceptibility of speci fi c tissues; and risks related to genetic predisposition. The biological mechanisms associated with local and patient -level risks are largely unknown. Conclusions: Future cancer care is expected to involve several available RT technologies, necessitating evidence and strategies to assess the performance of competing treatments. It is essential to maximize the utilization of existing follow-up while planning for prospective data collection, including standardized registration of individual treatment information with linkage across patient databases. (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Keywords

stokkevag@uib.no

Data Provider: Clarivate