Article,
Drainage effects on carbon budgets of degraded peatlands in the north of the Netherlands
Affiliations
- [1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Radboud Inst Biol & Environm Sci, Dept Ecol, Heyendaalseweg 135, NL-6525 AJ Nijmegen, Netherlands [NORA names: Netherlands; Europe, EU; OECD];
- [2] Wetterskip Fryslan, Fryslanplein 3, NL-8914 BZ Leeuwarden, Netherlands [NORA names: Netherlands; Europe, EU; OECD];
- [3] Aarhus Univ, Ctr Biodivers Dynam Changing World BIOCHANGE, Dept Biol, Ny Munkegade 116, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark [NORA names: AU Aarhus University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
- [4] Wageningen Univ, Water Syst & Global Change Grp, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands [NORA names: Netherlands; Europe, EU; OECD];
- [5] Univ Groningen, Integrated Res Energy Environm & Soc IREES, Nijenborgh 6, NL-9747 AG Groningen, Netherlands [NORA names: Netherlands; Europe, EU; OECD]
Abstract
Peatlands store vast amounts of carbon (C). However, land -use -driven drainage causes peat oxidation, resulting in CO 2 emission. There is a growing need for ground-truthing CO 2 emission and its potential drivers to better quantify long-term emission trends in peatlands. This will help improve National Inventory Reporting and ultimately aid the design and verification of mitigation measures. To investigate regional drivers of CO 2 emission, we estimated C budgets using custom-made automated chamber systems measuring CO 2 concentrations corrected for carbon export and import. Chamber systems were rotated among thirteen degraded peatland pastures in Friesland (the Netherlands). These peatlands varied in water table depth (WTD), drainage -irrigation management (fixed regulated ditch water level (DWL), subsurface irrigation, furrow irrigation, or dynamic regulated DWL), and soil moisture. We investigated (1) whether drainage -irrigation management and related hydrological drivers could explain variation in C budgets, (2) how nighttime ecosystem respiration ( R nighteco ) related to hydrological drivers, and (3) how C budgets compared with estimates from Tier 1 and Tier 2 models regularly used in National Inventory Reporting. Deep -drained peatlands largely overlapped with C budgets from shallowdrained peatlands. The variation in C budgets could not be explained with drainage -irrigation measures or annual WTD, likely because of high variation between sites. R nighteco increased from 85 to 250 kg CO 2 ha -1 day -1 as the WTD dropped from 0 to 50 cm across all sites. A deeper WTD had no apparent effect on R nighteco , which could be explained by the unimodal relationship we found between R night eco and soil moisture. Finally, C budgets estimated by Tier 1 emission factors and Tier 2 national models mismatched the between -site and between -year variation found in chamber -based estimated NECBs. To conclude, our study showed that shallow WTDs greatly determine C budgets and that regional C budgets, which can be accurately measure with periodic automated chamber measurements, are instrumental for model validation.